Nursing care
How to write a risk nursing diagnosis, with a fill-in template and examples
Written and reviewed by Nicole Ramirez, BSN, RN, CMSRN · 4 min read · Updated November 2026
Short answer
A risk nursing diagnosis has two parts: a label starting with Risk for, then the risk factors that make the problem likely, for example Risk for falls as evidenced by dizziness and weak legs. It lists no signs and symptoms because the problem has not happened yet, which is the main way it differs from an actual, problem-focused diagnosis.
The two-part template for a risk statement
The OpenRN Nursing Fundamentals text, which follows the NANDA International taxonomy, describes a risk diagnosis as a client's vulnerability to developing an undesirable response. The statement holds only the problem and the risk factors. There is no related-to cause and no list of defining characteristics, because nothing has gone wrong yet.
| Part | What goes here | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Label | Risk for plus the problem, using your program's approved label | Risk for falls |
| Connector | The phrase your template uses before risk factors; OpenRN uses as evidenced by | as evidenced by |
| Risk factors | Findings present now that raise the chance of the problem | dizziness when standing and decreased lower extremity strength |
| Goal | A measurable outcome stating that the problem does not occur | Client remains free of falls throughout the hospital stay |
| Interventions | Nursing actions aimed at each listed risk factor | Dangle before standing, assist with walking, keep call light in reach |
Write each risk factor as a specific finding, not a category. Weak legs on a strength check can be measured and targeted; a phrase like impaired mobility only restates another nursing diagnosis and gives the reader nothing to act on.
Actual versus risk: what changes in the statement
A problem-focused (actual) diagnosis uses three parts, often called PES: problem, etiology phrased as related to, and signs and symptoms. The OpenRN example is fluid volume excess related to excessive fluid intake, shown by crackles, pitting edema and a 10-pound weight gain. A risk statement drops the cause and the symptoms and uses risk factors instead.
| Feature | Problem-focused diagnosis | Risk diagnosis |
|---|---|---|
| Has the problem happened? | Yes, cues show it now | No, it is likely but absent |
| Parts | Problem, related to, as evidenced by or as manifested by | Problem plus risk factors |
| Evidence cited | Defining characteristics: signs and symptoms | Risk factors only |
| Goal wording | The problem improves or resolves | The problem does not develop |
| Evaluation question | Did the cues get better? | Did the problem stay absent? |
Why symptoms never follow the connector in a risk statement
Students sometimes write risk for infection as evidenced by fever and purulent drainage. Those are signs that infection is already present, so the statement contradicts itself. If cues of the problem exist, write the actual diagnosis. If they do not, list what makes the client vulnerable: a surgical incision, an invasive line, poor nutrition.
The wording trips people up because OpenRN does use as evidenced by in risk statements, but what follows is risk factors, not symptoms. Programs vary in the connector they ask for, so match your template. Whatever the connector, the test is the same: only conditions that raise the chance of harm, never evidence that harm has started.
Filled example: risk statements for an older client with pneumonia
Hypothetical client for practice: an 81-year-old with pneumonia is drowsy, coughs weakly, eats little and gets lightheaded when standing. MSD Manuals puts adults over 70 at the highest risk of pneumonia-related death and names altered mental status as something that weakens the airway's defenses, and the same findings feed several risk statements for this client.
| Risk diagnosis | Risk factors for this client | Nursing focus |
|---|---|---|
| Risk for aspiration | Drowsiness and a weak cough | Upright for meals, watch swallowing, oral care |
| Risk for falls | Lightheadedness on standing and new oxygen tubing | Dangle first, assist to the bathroom, keep tubing off the floor path |
| Risk for deficient fluid volume | Fever and low oral intake | Track intake and output, offer fluids if allowed, report falling urine output |
Rank them by consequence: aspiration threatens the airway, so it outranks falls. If this client begins coughing during meals and develops new crackles, the risk has become a problem, and the plan switches to an actual airway diagnosis supported by those new cues.
Sources and further reading
4.4: Diagnosis (Nursing Fundamentals, OpenRN). Four NANDA-I diagnosis types; risk diagnosis as vulnerability supported by risk factors; risk statements contain the problem and risk factors phrased as evidenced by, without related factors; PES format and the fluid volume excess and risk for falls examples.
Overview of Pneumonia (MSD Manual Professional Version). Adults over 70 listed at highest risk of pneumonia-related mortality; altered mental status named as impairing host defenses.
The next step on this is the same as on everything else here: answer questions and read the rationales. Our fundamentals practice questions are the closest set to what this page covers.
Common questions
How do you write a risk nursing diagnosis?
Start with Risk for and an approved label, add the connector your program uses, then list the risk factors present now. Example: Risk for falls as evidenced by dizziness on standing and weak lower extremities. Leave out signs and symptoms and a related-to cause.
Why does a risk diagnosis have no signs and symptoms after as evidenced by?
Because the problem has not occurred, there are no defining characteristics to cite. Some templates still use the phrase as evidenced by, but it introduces risk factors, such as an incision or immobility. If you find yourself listing symptoms, the actual diagnosis is the right one.
What is the difference between actual and risk nursing diagnosis?
An actual, or problem-focused, diagnosis describes a response already present and is supported by signs and symptoms. A risk diagnosis describes a response that has not happened and is supported only by risk factors. Goals differ too: improvement for actual, prevention for risk.
More on fundamentals