Skip to content

Why we built this

I sat the NCLEX in 2019 and spent the six weeks before it paying for a question bank that would not tell me who had written its questions. Half the rationales were a single sentence restating the correct answer. I passed, and I stayed annoyed about it, because the thing I actually needed — someone explaining why the other three options were wrong — was the one thing nobody was selling.

Nursia is the version of that product I wanted. Every question is written by a registered nurse, reviewed by two more, and mapped to a category on the NCSBN test plan before it goes anywhere near the site. Every rationale explains the distractors, not just the key. The names of the people who write and review them are on this page, with their credentials, because if we are asking you to trust an unknown brand with six weeks of your life, the least we can do is tell you who we are.

We are early. There are 1,200 questions where there should eventually be three thousand, the case studies are 40 of a planned 90, and we have no pass-rate statistic to show you because we have not been running long enough for one to mean anything. You will not find a testimonial wall here for the same reason. What you will find is the product, ungated, on almost every page — answer a few questions and decide for yourself.

— Dana Whitfield, RN, MSN
Founder

The team

Who writes the questions

Three people. All practising or recently practising, all named, all reachable.

Dana Whitfield

RN, MSN

Lead item writer

Eleven years med-surg and step-down, four years teaching NCLEX review.

Marcus Oyelaran

RN, BSN

Clinical reviewer

Emergency and critical care. Reviews every prioritization and safety item.

Priya Raghavan

RN, MSN, CNE

Test-plan reviewer

Maps each item to the NCSBN plan and signs off on the blueprint weights.

Process

How we write a question

Four steps, in order. Nobody else in this category publishes their process, which is odd, because it is free credibility and it is true.

  1. 1

    Map to the test plan

    Every item starts as a cell in the NCSBN blueprint — category, subtopic, and cognitive level — so the bank stays weighted the way the exam is weighted rather than the way we find it easy to write.

  2. 2

    An RN drafts it

    A practising nurse writes the stem, the options, and the rationale together. If the rationale cannot explain why each distractor fails, the item is not finished.

  3. 3

    Two peers review

    A clinical reviewer checks the medicine, a test-plan reviewer checks the mapping and the cognitive level. Both have to sign off, and either can send it back.

  4. 4

    Revise on the data

    Once live, we watch how the item performs. Anything almost everyone gets right, or that splits evenly between two options, gets rewritten or pulled.

Judge us on the questions.

That is the whole argument on this page, so here is the only fair test of it: 50 free questions, no card.

Start free →

Cancel anytime · 14-day refund